IJRET
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • ischolar
  • Index Copernicus
  • IJRET
  • Alternate Text
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • Alternate Text
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
Authors will receive one hard copy of full paper, individual print certificates and digital certificates, Submit Manuscript

CALL FOR PAPERS : DEC-2018

Submission Last Date :  30-Dec-2018
Acceptance Notification :  in 15 days
Publication Date :  in 5 days
Submit Manuscript Online

FOR AUTHORS

FOR REVIEWERS

IJRET® PUBLICATIONS

DOWNLOADS

CONTACT US

NEWS & UPDATES

Call for Paper Vol-7 Iss-02 Feb-2018

IJRET invites papers from various engineering disciplines for Volume-07 Issue-02, Feb-2018.

Submit Manuscript

Published Vol-07 Iss-01 Jan-18

IJRET Volume-07 Issue-01, Jan-2018 is published now.

Browse Papers

EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON REPLACEMENT OF CEMENT WITH CHALK POWDER AND COCONUT FIBER IN CONVENTIONAL CONCRETE

Vineet Singh T, Tiwari Rakesh Prasad, Sure Mounika, Vemula Sujeeth Kumar Reddy

Abstract: The materials chosen for construction should be pollution and should not endanger the resources. They should be conveniently used by the ordinary people and be low in monetary cost. Coconut fiber and chalk powder are abundant, versatile, renewable and cheap. Reusing of chalk powder reduces the waste released by various schools, colleges and educational institutions. Coconut Fiber is light in weight and is consistent in high quality. The aim of this experimental study was to check whether there is a possibility of using the coconut fiber and chalk powder in addition to the other constituents of concrete and to study the strength properties. In the present study the deformation properties of concrete cubes under static loading condition and the behavior of structural components in terms of compressive strength for conventional concrete(CC), chalk powder reinforced concrete (CPRC) and coconut fiber reinforced concrete(CFRC) has been studied. In this project we have prepared 21 cubes out of which 3 are CC, 3 CPRC(1%), 3 CPRC(2%), 3 CPRC (3%), 3 CFRC(1%), 3 CFRC(2%), 3 CFRC(3%). To identify the effects on workability, workability tests such slump cone test was conducted on the cubes prepared by conventional concrete, chalk powder and coconut fiber. The standard cubes for CC, CPRC and CFRC were casted and tested under CTM (compression testing machine). We conclude that there is a decrement by 4.4% in compressive strength of CP (1%) when compared to CC. There is a decrement by 2.8% in compressive strength of CP (2%) when compared to CC. There is a decrement by 8.4% in compressive strength of CP (3%) when compared to CC. There is a decrement by 2% in compressive strength of CF (1%) when compared to CC. There is a increment by 1.7% in compressive strength of CF (2%) when compared to CC. There is a increment by 4.2% in compressive strength of CF (3%) when compared to CC

Keywords: CC – conventional concrete, CPRC – chalk powder reinforced concrete, CFRC –coconut fiber reinforced concrete, CP – Chalk Powder, CF – Coconut fiber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2016.0509047

Home | Publication Ethics | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Refund Policy | Feedback | Contact Us
Copyright © 2012-2018 IJRET Journal All rights reserved