IJRET
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • ischolar
  • Index Copernicus
  • IJRET
  • Alternate Text
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • Alternate Text
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
Authors will receive one hard copy of full paper, individual print certificates and digital certificates, Submit Manuscript

CALL FOR PAPERS : DEC-2018

Submission Last Date :  30-Dec-2018
Acceptance Notification :  in 15 days
Publication Date :  in 5 days
Submit Manuscript Online

FOR AUTHORS

FOR REVIEWERS

IJRET® PUBLICATIONS

DOWNLOADS

CONTACT US

NEWS & UPDATES

Call for Paper Vol-7 Iss-02 Feb-2018

IJRET invites papers from various engineering disciplines for Volume-07 Issue-02, Feb-2018.

Submit Manuscript

Published Vol-07 Iss-01 Jan-18

IJRET Volume-07 Issue-01, Jan-2018 is published now.

Browse Papers

ENERGY ABSORPTION ANALYSIS OF RUPD

Satish Gombi, Mahendra .S.B, Amithkumar H

Abstract: When passenger car hits the truck-trailer at rear, it penetrates inside the truck bed called truck trailer under-ride crash. This is responsible for thousands of accidents, causing severe injuries and spot death. This is mostly due to the lack of effective guards. The Present work focuses on energy absorption analysis of a Rear under Run Protection Device (RUPD) under crash scenario. The aim of the study is to replace Steel RUPD with RUPD made of composite material to reduce weight of the vehicle. In this study carbon fibre reinforced plastic composites were selected due to their high specific strength and specific stiffness which make them a preferred candidate in the material selection for modern lightweight structures in automotive engineering which can contribute to the improvement of mileage in addition to safety of the occupants. The RUPD was modelled in CATIA. Finite element model was generated in HYPERMESH and analysed in LS-DYNA for both Carbon/Epoxy RUPD and Steel RUPD and observed that Carbon/Epoxy RUPD absorbs 50% of kinetic energy; whereas steel RUPD absorbs 90%. But weight of Steel RUPD is 75 kg whereas the weight of Carbon/Epoxy RUPD is less than Steel RUPD which found to be below 15 kg. This results in weight reduction and increases mileage of the vehicle. Considering above advantage, composites can be potential candidate for RUPD

Keywords: Carbon/Epoxy, Catia, Hypermesh, LS-Dyna, RUPD, Steel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2015.0402027

Home | Publication Ethics | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Refund Policy | Feedback | Contact Us
Copyright © 2012-2018 IJRET Journal All rights reserved