IJRET
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • ischolar
  • Index Copernicus
  • IJRET
  • Alternate Text
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • Alternate Text
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
  • IJRET
Authors will receive one hard copy of full paper, individual print certificates and digital certificates, Submit Manuscript

CALL FOR PAPERS : DEC-2018

Submission Last Date :  30-Dec-2018
Acceptance Notification :  in 15 days
Publication Date :  in 5 days
Submit Manuscript Online

FOR AUTHORS

FOR REVIEWERS

IJRET® PUBLICATIONS

DOWNLOADS

CONTACT US

NEWS & UPDATES

Call for Paper Vol-7 Iss-02 Feb-2018

IJRET invites papers from various engineering disciplines for Volume-07 Issue-02, Feb-2018.

Submit Manuscript

Published Vol-07 Iss-01 Jan-18

IJRET Volume-07 Issue-01, Jan-2018 is published now.

Browse Papers

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF QOS BASED ROUTING PROTOCOLS MBRR, REAR AND SPEED FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS

Deepak Verma, Amardeep Kaur

Abstract: A wireless sensor network (WSN) is a collection of small randomly dispersed micro sensor nodes that have capability to sense, establish wireless communication between each other and do computations and process operations. A network especially wireless network strongly depends on the routing protocols to route the sensed data to the Base Station (BS) via some intermediate nodes. Due to fast emergence of the wireless sensing, a lot of work has been done on the various categories of routing protocols of WSN like location-based, data-centric, hierarchal routing protocols etc. to measure the network performance. But recent studies are provided with the evidence that Quality-of-Service (QoS) routing can enhance the network performance by increasing the network utilization, compared to routing that is not sensitive to QoS requirements of traffic. So in this paper, the focus is on evaluation and comparison of the network performance in the WSN having QoS routing. The comparison of the three QoS routing protocols MBRR (Majority Based Re-Routing), REAR (Reliable Energy Aware Routing) and SPEED (Stateless Protocol for End-to-End Delay) on the basis of various performance metrics such as Bit Error Rate (BER) vs. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), Average End-to-End Delay vs. BER, Packet Delivery Ratio vs. BER, Energy Consumed vs. BER, Network Lifetime vs. Energy Consumption, Throughput vs. BER and Throughput vs. SNR has been done in this research paper. On the basis of observed simulation results, it is concluded that the performance of MBRR is better than the performance of other two comparing protocols i.e. REAR and SPEED.

Keywords: Wireless Sensor Networks, Routing Protocols, QoS Routing, and Performance Evaluation etc

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2013.0209040

Home | Publication Ethics | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Refund Policy | Feedback | Contact Us
Copyright © 2012-2018 IJRET Journal All rights reserved